Section 1202 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) of 1986 provides a significant financial benefit for qualified businesses. It allows these businesses to be sold without incurring federal capital gains tax. 

• This provision, also known as the Small Business Stock Gains Exclusion, is widely recognized and adopted by most states. They also exclude capital gains tax on the sale of qualified small business stock (QSBS). 
• To understand the benefits of Section 1202, you can conduct a simple Google search for "What are the benefits of Section 1202?".  

Furthermore, a business sale transaction under Section 1202 

1. does not negatively affect liquidity. 
2. It eliminates the need to involve a charity or maintain any ongoing structure. 
3. Importantly, it does not require any reinvestment of the sales proceeds. 

This makes Section 1202 beneficial for small businesses, providing them with a tax-efficient way to sell their business.

The IRS offers two provisions, namely §1202 and §351, which are excellent financial strategies that can help you achieve the following:

1. You can speed up your retirement plans while significantly increasing your wealth.

2. You can share a portion of this wealth with your key team members to keep them motivated and loyal. This strategy can also help you attract top-tier talent. Combining these strategies with enterprise risk management (ERM) can give you a significant competitive advantage.

3. You can close M&A deals much sooner, in a matter of months or even years, and boost your net profit by millions. This is possible as buyers and sellers can share the benefits and still come out financially stronger.

4. You can use the lesser-known intricacies of IRS §1202 and §351 to acquire competitors and/or suppliers at a much-reduced cost.

In order for stock to qualify as Qualified Small Business Stock (QSBS), it needs to meet six basic requirements:

1. The stock must be issued by a C corporation, based in the US, that has no more than $50 million in gross assets at the time of issuance. The corporation is prohibited from redeeming a significant portion of its stock within a two-year period, starting one year prior to the issuance date. A substantial stock redemption is characterized as the redemption of stocks whose aggregate value exceeds 5% of the total value of the company's stock.

2. The issuing corporation must use at least 80% of its assets (in terms of value) in an active trade or business. Certain personal services and 24 types of businesses specified below are excluded from this.

3. The stock must have been issued after August 10, 1993.

4. The stock must be held by a non-corporate taxpayer, which refers to any taxpayer that is not a corporation.

5. The taxpayer must have acquired the stock upon its original issuance. However, there are exceptions to this rule, which are discussed in our CPA webinar.

6. The stock must be held for more than six months to be eligible for a tax-free rollover under Section 1045, and for more than five years to qualify for gain exclusion.

Seller Benefits

If the seller is not already established as a C corporation or hasn't completed the 5-year holding period, tax lawyers can still structure the deal to comply with IRS regulations. This can be done by combining the benefits of §1202 with traditional tax-free M&A reorganizational structures such as §351. This strategy allows a seller to meet the tax-free sale criteria under §1202 before finalizing an agreement with the buyer.

There are two primary methods to reach the maximum value of $50 million. The first method permits up to $10 million in profit per owner. For example, if three owners started the company from scratch (referred to as 'zero basis' in real estate), that would add up to 3 x $10 million, resulting in a total of $30 million tax-free. The second method is 10 times the adjusted tax basis of appreciated assets, or a combination of these two methods, which technically creates a third option.

For instance, if one of the three owners initially invested $3 million in the company, the first two owners would still qualify for (2x $10 million = $20 million); however, the third owner would now qualify for (10 x $3 million = $30 million), resulting in a total of $50 million tax-free.  Is it necessary for all of the company's stock to qualify for QSBS to receive these benefits? The answer is no.

Example of Maximizing Seller Benefits

In the late 1990s, three friends - John, Paul, and George - started a tech company in Silicon Valley from scratch, which is known as 'zero basis' in tax terms. Their company grew rapidly over the years and was valued at $50 million by 2005. However, when they decided to sell, they were concerned about the hefty tax bill they would face. To address this, they consulted with a tax lawyer specializing in M&A transactions, who explained that they could still structure the deal to comply with IRS regulations and save on taxes. He proposed integrating the benefits of §1202, which allows for tax-free sales of qualified small business stock (QSBS), with traditional tax-free M&A re-organizational structures such as §351.

The lawyer explained that there were two primary methods to reach the maximum value of $50 million tax-free. 

1. The first method allowed up to $10 million in profit per owner, resulting in a total of $30 million tax-free since there were three owners. 
2. The second method was not applicable since none of the owners had made a significant initial investment. However, the lawyer pointed out that these two methods could be combined to create a third option.
3. Under the third option, one of the owners, say George, would invest $3 million into the company before the sale. This would enable the first two owners to qualify for $20 million tax-free (2x $10 million), and George to qualify for $30 million tax-free (10 x $3 million), resulting in a total of $50 million tax-free. The owners were relieved to learn that not all of the company's stock needed to qualify for QSBS to receive these benefits.

They proceeded with the sale, saving millions in taxes thanks to their lawyer's strategic advice.

Wisdom within the  Seller  Example

This story demonstrates the potential advantages of tax planning and emphasizes the importance of consulting with a tax professional when contemplating a significant business transaction. The tax code is intricate and continuously evolving, and misunderstandings or misinterpretations of the rules can be expensive. By seeking expert advice, the owners of the tech company were able to structure their sale in a way that maximized their profits and minimized their tax liability. This is just one instance of how tax planning can make a significant difference in the outcome of a business transaction. Whether you're thinking of selling your business, making a large investment, or planning for retirement, it's always advisable to consult with a tax professional to ensure you're making the most of your financial decisions.

Investor Benefits

Investors may qualify for a bigger tax exclusion if their initial investment doesn't push the C company's gross assets beyond $50 million. For example, if an Angel investor invests $15 million, they may enjoy a tax exclusion on a gain of up to $150 million. In the case of an investor partnership, the tax exclusion is applied to each partner's share of the profit. QSBS qualified investors are eligible for a 60-day rollover period under §1045 to reinvest in new QSBS and defer their taxes. However, investors must have held their QSBS stock for more than six months to qualify for this benefit. This 60-day rollover period begins on the date of sale of the previous QSBS. The exemption rate can be 50%, 75%, or 100%, depending on the date when the taxpayer acquired their stock. Congress enhanced the §1202 exemption amount on three distinct dates, resulting in this variation. Besides, modifications were made to both the capital gains tax rate and the alternative minimum tax (AMT) adjustments.

First Example of Maximizing Investor Benefits

In 2010, a promising tech startup called C Company received a $15 million investment from a group of angel investors led by Peter Thiel.  At the time, the company was valued at $35 million. The investors were careful not to push the company beyond the $50 million gross asset threshold to take advantage of tax exclusion benefits. Over the next few years, C Company experienced exponential growth and was eventually sold for $165 million. Thanks to their initial strategic investment, the investors were able to enjoy a tax exclusion on a gain of up to $150 million. Each partner in the investor partnership could apply the tax exclusion to their individual share of the profit. Moreover, they could take advantage of the government's 60-day rollover period under §1045, allowing them to reinvest in new QSBS and defer their taxes. 

However, this was only possible because they had held their QSBS stock for a period exceeding six months. The exemption rate for the investors varied between 50%, 75%, and 100%, depending on the date each investor acquired their stock. Congress enhanced the §1202 exemption amount on three distinct dates, which caused the variation in the exemption rate. Additionally, modifications were made to both the capital gains tax rate and the alternative minimum tax (AMT) adjustments. This real-life example illustrates the significant benefits investors can enjoy if they strategically plan their investments and stay informed about the changing tax laws.

Second example of maximizing Investor Benefits

Back in 2010, a group of angel investors called the Silicon Valley Syndicate made a strategic investment in a promising tech startup called TechNovo Inc. The startup was valued at $35 million, and the syndicate invested $15 million, making sure the company's gross asset value remained under the $50 million threshold. This allowed the investors to qualify for tax exclusion benefits under the QSBS (Qualified Small Business Stock) rules. 

Fast forward to 2015, and TechNovo Inc. was acquired by a tech giant for an astonishing $500 million. This meant that the Silicon Valley Syndicate's initial investment of $15 million had grown to $200 million. Thanks to the QSBS rules, each investor in the syndicate was able to exclude up to $150 million of their share of the profit from their taxable income. Additionally, they were able to defer their taxes by reinvesting their gains in new QSBS within the 60-day rollover period. 

The story of the Silicon Valley Syndicate and TechNovo Inc. perfectly illustrates how smart investors can use tax laws to optimize their returns. It also highlights the importance of understanding tax laws and their implications on investment decisions. The QSBS rules, in particular, have played a crucial role in encouraging investments in small businesses and startups, thereby driving innovation and economic growth.

Section 1202 of the Internal Revenue Code provides an opportunity for small business investors to fully exclude capital gains tax for stocks acquired after September 27, 2010. Additionally, the capital gains that are exempted under this provision are also free from the 3.8% net investment income (NII) tax, which is typically applied to most forms of investment income. 

However, this was not always the case. Before February 18, 2009, §1202 only allowed for a 50% exclusion of capital gains from the gross income. This percentage was later increased to 75% under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act for stocks purchased between February 18, 2009, and September 27, 2010. For qualifying small business stocks, a portion of the excluded gain is taxed as a preference item, which incurs an additional 7% tax known as the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT). The AMT is generally levied on individuals or investors who benefit from tax exemptions that enable them to reduce the amount of income tax they pay. 

[THE PDF that you can download features a Table here showing the 3 phases of IRC 1202 and the final phase since 2010 offers the greatest value. The reason I can not put the table on the website is the limitations of the website software. ]

To qualify for §1202, a corporation must engage in a "qualified trade or business." However, there are 24 specific types of businesses that are excluded from this qualification. These include healthcare, legal services, engineering, architecture, accounting, actuarial science, performing arts, consulting, athletics, financial services, brokerage services, any trade or business where the primary asset is the reputation or skill of one or more employees, banking, insurance, leasing, financing, investing or similar businesses, any farming business (including tree raising or harvesting), any business involved in the production or extraction of products eligible for percentage depletion, and any business operating a hotel, motel, restaurant, or similar establishment. These businesses are not eligible for §1202 due to the nature of their operations and the specific criteria set by the regulation.

In order to qualify for §1202, a corporation must be an "eligible corporation," which excludes the following: DISC, a corporation that either has a §936 election in effect or one of its subsidiaries does, a regulated investment company, REIT, or REMIC, or a cooperative. Moreover, the corporation must engage in a "qualified trade or business." However, there are 24 specific types of businesses that are excluded from this classification. These include:

1. Healthcare 

2. Legal services 

3. Engineering 

4. Architecture 

5. Accounting 

6. Actuarial science 

7. Performing arts 

8. Consulting 

9. Athletics 

10. Financial services 

11. Brokerage services 

12. Any trade or business where the primary asset is the reputation or skill of one or more employees 

13. Banking 

14. Insurance 

15. Leasing 

16. Financing 

17. Investing or similar businesses 

18. Any farming business, including tree raising or harvesting 

19. Any business involved in the production or extraction of products eligible for percentage depletion 

20. Any business operating a hotel, motel, restaurant, or similar establishment. 

Certain types of businesses cannot benefit from §1202 due to their operations and the specific criteria established by the regulation. Additionally, the business must meet the requirements to qualify as an “eligible corporation,” which excludes the following entities from the benefits of §1202: a DISC, a corporation that has a §936 election in effect or one of its subsidiaries does, a regulated investment company, a REIT or REMIC, or a cooperative.

by Howard Francis, Co_Founder, CEO and Author of 4 books. 

Please note that the information provided on this website is intended for general informational purposes only and should not be considered as legal advice. It is possible that the information and materials available on this site may not be the most up-to-date or accurate. Additionally, this website may contain links to other third-party websites for your convenience, but please be advised that C Suite Due Diligence.com and its members do not endorse or recommend the contents of these third-party sites.

Please be advised that the information provided on this website is not intended to be legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. It is recommended that you seek the advice of a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for guidance on any specific legal matter. 

This website is provided for informational purposes only and does not establish an attorney-client relationship between you and the authors, contributors, contributing law firms, or committee members and their respective employers. The use of this website or any of the links or resources contained within it does not create such a relationship. Your interpretation of the information provided on this website may not be applicable or appropriate to your particular situation, and only your individual attorney can provide such assurances. Therefore, no reader, user or browser of this site should act or refrain from acting based solely on the information provided here without first seeking legal advice from counsel in the relevant jurisdiction.

The opinions expressed on this site are solely those of the individual authors. They do not represent the views of their respective employers, committees, or task forces as a whole. The authors take no responsibility for any actions taken or not taken based on the information presented on this site. The content is provided without any guarantees or warranties, and we make no claims that it is free from errors or inaccuracies.